Re: {bb} Overloading BB!

[Jeremy Wilson <jwilson@webfinity.net>]

At 04:18 PM 11/29/99 , you wrote:
>2.      I don't understand what you mean by 0.0.0.0 with http.  Are these
>         just virtual domains on a few big boxes or what?


Like:
0.0.0.0 machine-name    # http://machine-name

So that it checks by the domain name.

>3.      It may be serious enough to merit an instance of BB per class of
>         service (or break up the work some other way).

The problem I'm getting is that the bb-page.sh's back up and chew CPU time 
like no one's business.  I'm getting loads of 30-40!

>4.      Also, having a single bbnet machine testing hundreds of web pages
>         will certainly take a little while... consider breaking things up
>         into multiple BBNET machines which each test a subset of your net.


Unfortunately I do not have that luxury.  This little Sparc 20 running 
Linux is all they'll give me.

>If you notice specific, nasty performance bottlenecks, let us know and we'll
>squish them.

Just the huge number of bb-page.sh's running to do each lookup.  If there's 
a more efficient way to do this, I'm all ears.  Thanks...


--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.