RE: {bb} bb vs. netsaint

[Henrik Olsen <henrik@iaeste.dk>]

On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, DC Smith wrote:
> Looking at Netsaint - it looks pretty good.  But the licensing looks really
> good - looks GPL.  That was one of my major problems with BB.  As a
> consultant I could not legally install it for an existing client (even
> though I am there for other reasons) and charge those hours (although I see
> now that there are some changes to licensing wording from the last time I
> checked). I definitely want to increase my billing hours and love setting up
> Linux solutions as opposed to Windoze. I could not add BB to my list of
> "Linux Solutions".
> 
> Don't get me wrong, in re-reading the BB license page
> http://www.bb4.com/license.html it sounds fair, and very understandable.
> And I like BB and have created some cool enhancements.  But my company and I
> could not "sell" free OS and $$ apps (and our services of course).
> 
> My $0.02
> Dave Smith
You can bill for installing BB, what you can't do is bill for BB itself,
or for running it.
What you do with ext scripts is entierly up to the copyright holder 
and the licence its released under.

-- 
Henrik Olsen,  Dawn Solutions I/S       URL=http://www.iaeste.dk/~henrik/
  Animal behaviour is best described by the four F's.
  Feed, Fight, Flee and Reproduce.


--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.