Re: {bb} Variable Time Checks...

[Franklin.Petersen@crown.com]

Hum, I never saw Robert-Andre's reply, but I must agree with you Henrik.  Now
that I reconsider it, to be honest, this is truly a better approach.  Who's to
say we dont want to activly monitor one service, but passivly(ie longer between
checks) monitor other services on the same host.

:-)
Frank




Henrik Olsen <henrik@iaeste.dk> on 01/01/2000 12:10:31 PM

Please respond to bb@bb4.com

To:   bb@bb4.com
cc:    (bcc: Franklin Petersen/Support/IS/CrownNotes)

Subject:  Re: {bb} Variable Time Checks...




On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Sean MacGuire wrote:
> The purple situation will be addressed in the next release;
> each test will have an expiration date (like milk), so that
> it'll go purple when that time is expired, (again like milk).
>
> As for how to change the frequencies of testing... hmmm... a
> good idea.  (Just how to abuse the bb-hosts file to do it :)
Personally I don't think it's a good idea to put the timeout in bb-hosts,
it's likely that the timeout will be specific to the test, not to the host
so trying to specify it in bb-hosts will make that file very confusing.

The suggestion of Robert-Andre to put the timeout in the status message as
STATUS+time_valid, sounds a lot better, and will put the decision where it
belongs, the tester.

--
Henrik Olsen,  Dawn Solutions I/S       URL=http://www.iaeste.dk/~henrik/
A Pentium is a terrible thing to waste, http://www.mersenne.org/prime.htm


--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.






--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.