BB Unix Network Monitor - Message
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: {bb} Generating bb-hosts file
- To: <bb@bb4.com>
- Subject: RE: {bb} Generating bb-hosts file
- From: "Cole, Michael - MLMC Toronto" <mcole@munichre.ca>
- Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 15:35:06 -0400
- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
- Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
- Reply-to: bb@bb4.com
- Sender: owner-bb@bb4.com
- Thread-index: AcRFAE8ca3AWZdomRT2ScI/Jg+E99gAsaRyA
- Thread-topic: {bb} Generating bb-hosts file
Thanks for you help, everyone who wrote me directly and everyone who wrote to the mailing list. :)
Turns out, as I confessed to some of you privately, I am a big idiot. (And I'm not even working in the Bush administration!) The issue I had was I have a script that is auto run by the crontab once per day that builds all the BB Scripts and the bb-bbexttab and bb-hosts file, the problem is my script (which I have completely rewritten in the past few days to make it much more adaptable to changes in the environment) had the following:
...
rm bb-hosts
...
runbb.sh stop
...
In the original script, that did work I had things the other way around. Clearly the BBHOST, MLMC-MON, or mlmc-mon is not going to be in a file that does not exist, hence my stupidity.
Although Philip, I am not so sure about the case sensitivity thing, at least Red Hat does not seem to mind when it comes to host names if it is block or lower case. I suspect the code in gethostbyname() is pretty well user proofed, at least when I was writing C on a Sun it seemed pretty user proofed, but without looking at the code in BB it would be a good thing to check up on, thanx anyway.
MJC
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bb@bb4.com [mailto:owner-bb@bb4.com]On Behalf Of Philip
Clark
Sent: May 28, 2004 18:05
To: bb@bb4.com
Subject: Re: {bb} Generating bb-hosts file
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 21:56, Cole, Michael - MLMC Toronto wrote:
> This host <MLMC-MON> was not found in the etc/bb-hosts file
> Please use the same name from 'uname -n'
Just in case the penny hasn't dropped yet. "mlmc-mon" is not the
same as "MLMC-MON". Not for a "real" operating system, anyway :)
Cheers, Phil.
--
Fine's Corollary: Functionality breeds Contempt.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index