BB Unix Network Monitor - Message
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: {bb} larrd and vmstat graph missing ...
- To: <bb@bb4.com>
- Subject: RE: {bb} larrd and vmstat graph missing ...
- From: "Sunil Modi \(IT\)" <smodi@bordersgroupinc.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:07:25 -0500
- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
- Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
- Reply-to: bb@bb4.com
- Sender: owner-bb@bb4.com
- Thread-index: AcTXCrGfoSLT5BNNTMOaVUMFKuOpzgAqsnPQ
- Thread-topic: {bb} larrd and vmstat graph missing ...
> Ok,
> I think I have found the cause why larrd does not work
> for the following graph: vmstat0,vmstat6-9. The data
> are bieng collected but not graph due to different DS
> name. The collector that is putting the data into RRD
> database reffers to swap as "mem_swpd" where as the
> grapher is calling it "mem_swap". Hence the error
> from larrd-grapher.cgi: "No DS called 'mem_swap'".
> Does anyone have any idea how to fixed this? Thanks.
Are all your systems being monitored the same, or is it a mix of servers?
The reason I ask is there are 2 solutions
1. If the systems are the same across the board, then change larrd grapher (simple) to "mem_swpd" to be able to see all the graphs across the redhat systems
2. If it's various systems, you will lose your current RRD's and have to restart from fresh, but remove the current RRD's and rename the DS in vmstat-larrd" to mem_swap".
If I'm missing anything I do apologize, but I think that's the easiest way to do it. If anyone has better suggestions, please advise as data loss is not always a valid suggestion.
hope that helps
-sunil
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index