BB Unix Network Monitor - Message
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: {bb} question about LARRD graphs
- To: <bb@bb4.com>
- Subject: RE: {bb} question about LARRD graphs
- From: "Ron Bergeron" <ron.bergeron@converge.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:11:42 -0500
- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
- Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- Reply-to: bb@bb4.com
- Sender: owner-bb@bb4.com
- Thread-index: AcUOFwlE3v/0CA18Q96X5zjg0z1wOQAAnlHg
- Thread-topic: {bb} question about LARRD graphs
> I believe the number is in 1K blocks. So 19.3M is 19.3M 1k blocks or
> 19.3GB. Does that make more sense?
I guess that makes sense in that it adds up to the right amount. It is a
pretty awkward, non-intuitive way of displaying the disk space.
Especially since "M" has always meant "megabytes" when it comes to disk
space. If I get the time, I'll look into it more and possibly change it
so it displays it in more sensible terms.
Thanks.
Ron
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index