Re: {bb} bb redundancy

[Philip Clark <bblist@cannae.uklinux.net>]

You can configure failover BBNET and BBPAGER servers using the
Unix (and Unix-like) version of BB. I can't remember if there
is an equivalent for the Windows version. Redundancy, in the
case of a BBDISPLAY, is simply a matter of configuring more
than one.

But, to reiterate, if people on the list are going to provide
meaningful advice, it would be helpful to know the scale of the
problem. What hardware are you using for each of your BB servers
and how many hosts and tests are each on each of the BBDISPLAYs?

Cheers, Phil.



On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 00:18, Jason Beltrame wrote:
> We currently have 1 bbdisplay/bbnet for windows server, and one
> bbdisplay/bbnet for open source.  All which report to 1 bb server that
> is just a bbpager.  What is the best solution to provide redundancy to
> this?  Is there failover etc?
> 
> Thanks!



-- 
There are no physicists in the hottest parts of hell, because the
existence
of a "hottest part" implies a temperature difference, and any marginally
competent physicist would immediately use this to run a heat engine and
make some other part of hell comfortably cool. This is obviously
impossible.
(Richard Davisson)

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.