I've run into the same problem. I find that at a certain length it fails.:
host.domain.net: : "java -Xmx512m -Djava.compiler=None comms.Server;=1" works host.domain.net: : "java -Xmx512m -Djava.compiler=None comms.Server compute.param" doesn't work
I tried all manor of ways of writing this. Singles quotes around each part of the process, single quotes around bits of the process etc. But this doesn't seem to want to work at all...
Anyone got a solution?
thanx
Timo
Shad Taylor <shad.taylor@cicadacorp.com> Sent by: owner-bb@bb4.com
14/07/2005 17:34
Please respond to bb
To: "'bb@bb4.com'" <bb@bb4.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: {bb} bb-proctab issues
I have tried wrapping each process _expression_ within single quotes and it
still does not work. I also tried breaking up the larger (3 proc) localhost
entry down to a single proc entry:
BB doesn't seem to like inserting the single quotations . . . it seems as if
it takes each as an individual quotes as a separate process to search for.
So, to sum it up; if I remark out the first localhost entry below, the
second works . . . in the fashion that it checks only for " java -Xmx256m
-classpath ." and shows three processes running (where it should list each
out individually). If I remark out the second localhost check, the first
will work just fine (whole process name and all). If I leave both checks in
place . . . it breaks them both:
I'm probably just screwing up something simple here.
Thanks,
Shad
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Sabados (IT) [mailto:LSABADOS@bordersgroupinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:19 AM
To: bb@bb4.com
Subject: RE: {bb} bb-proctab issues
Did you try surrounding the whole process expressions individually with
single quotes? Each process _expression_, if containing spaces must be
presented with the single quotes to resolve the entire process "name".
-Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bb@bb4.com [mailto:owner-bb@bb4.com]On Behalf Of Shad Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 6:37 PM
To: 'bb@bb4.com'
Subject: {bb} bb-proctab issues
Brethren,
I'm running into a strange issue monitoring long process names/paths. I
have been monitoring several processes for quite some time with no issue
(including the first java process listed in the below snip from the
bb-proctab in question):
&red -XX >=1 - not running, requires at least 1
&red -Xmx1024m >=1 - not running, requires at least 1
&red -Xms1024m >=1 - not running, requires at least 1
&green java -Xmx256m -classpath . >=1 - 3 instances running
------------------------
If I remark out the first "localhost" line, it will obviously remove the
"red" failed checks for the process listing that has always worked
previously. If I remark out the second localhost line (the addition added
today)from my bb-proctab, the first check then processes as usual and does
not fail either.
I can understand that the process checking may not grep the entire name, and
so it shows only the "java -Xmx256m -classpath ." for the three individual
processes I actually have listed (for the new addition). What I do not
understand is why the first java check fails when I add these three new
processes I'm now monitoring?
If anyone can point me in the right direction, I would greatly appreciate
it.
Shad
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.
**********************************************************************
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have any problems with this transmission please contact
postmaster@sqa.org.uk
**********************************************************************