BB Unix Network Monitor - Message
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
{bb} Negative disk usage and incorrect avail/capacity?
- To: <bb@bb4.com>
- Subject: {bb} Negative disk usage and incorrect avail/capacity?
- From: "Szabady, Paul \(NIH/NIEHS\) [C]" <szabady@niehs.nih.gov>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:02:02 -0500
- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
- Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- Reply-to: bb@bb4.com
- Sender: owner-bb@bb4.com
- Thread-index: AcYmiA6Go4U3NSx/SL6GJH0BOufShA==
- Thread-topic: Negative disk usage and incorrect avail/capacity?
Greetings,
I'm not sure when this started, but I see that locally attached large
volumes are not reporting proper disk usage/capacity stats.
For example, I have a 8TB+ drive shelf (drive D:) on a machine which is
reporting:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail
Capacity Mounted
D 775925760 -3412431616 4188357376
-439% /FIXED/D
Another machine with a 4TB+ drive shelf is reporting:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail
Capacity Mounted
D 387962880 -713896192 1101859072
-184% /FIXED/D
Server is bb19c
Clients are both Windows 1.08d
I have a number of servers with 1TB+ and 2TB+ "drives" that seem to
report properly. These are SAN attached, whereas the first two examples
are locally attached.
Any thoughts/suggestions?
---------------
Paul G. Szabady
Contracted to the:
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Research on Environment-Related Disease
http://www.niehs.nih.gov
919.361.5444 x421
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index