RE: {bb} bb-proctab

[Philip Clark <bblist@cannae.uklinux.net>]

On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 16:20, Daniel O Winkless wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>         I have a slightly simpler situation.  I have a task where I need 
> at least one running.  but more than 75 is a concern (yellow).  And more 
> that 100 is a major concern (red).  So I don't need t look for too few... 
> I use:
> localhost : task;<75 : task;<100
> 
> Because this WORKS for ME, I think the syntax is saying, "when this 
> condition is NOT met, set this color."  IN the above, if I have fewer than 
> 75 instances of task, yellow is NOT set.  If I have fewer than 100 
> instances, red is NOT set.
>         For you, I would try something like:
> here.myplace.com :  aproc;3 ; aproc;>2 aproc;<5
> 
> I read this as:
> to avoid yellow, there must be three instances of aproc
> to avoid red, there must be more than two instances of aproc
> to avoid red, there must be fewer than five instances of aproc
>         The only condition where green is permitted to survive the testing 
> is three instances.  When there are four, the yellow state is signalled 
> because there are not three instances. 
>         The procs status page should have three lines for the status of 
> aproc, one for each condition.

Oh yes. Mia culpa. I got the logic twisted around. The rules do
indeed need to be in the form of "asserts".

Cheers, Phil.


 
-- 
The goal of Computer Science is to build something that will last
at least until we've finished building it.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.