BB Unix Network Monitor - Message
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: {bb} dig on clients?
- To: <bb@bb4.com>
- Subject: RE: {bb} dig on clients?
- From: "Cristian Danci" <cristiand@heatgroup.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:28:50 +1000
- Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
- Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- Reply-to: bb@bb4.com
- Sender: owner-bb@bb4.com
- Thread-index: AcZ+GrFKAinkM4okS1Ss8TCYWDrYfAAAil9A
- Thread-topic: {bb} dig on clients?
Thanks Phil,
This email in particular is for 5.1
However after doing a clean install on 5.3 (and coping the bbdef.sh from
the 5.1 box) I'm starting to believe it is a name issue.
On the 5.1 and 5.3 box; uname returns the name of the box which is
directly resolvable.
$ uname -n
heat
$ ping heat
PING heat: (10.0.0.6): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.0.6: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.0.6: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0 ms
^C
However the bb server is sitting on fedora box (it has the host names as
heat.domain.com.au)
Does the server and the client need to have the same DNS entries?
Also I can't find "set -x":
# find . -exec grep "set -x" '{}' \; -print
# pwd
/home/crisd/bbnew/bbc1.9i-btf
#
BBOUT on 5.3:
Tue May 23 14:13:49 2006 bb-local.sh
/home/crisd/bbnew/bbc1.9i-btf/bin/bb-combo.
sh[67]: status .disk red Tue May 23 14:13:49 EET 2006 - Disk on at
PANIC level^
J&red /pro (100%) has reached the defined disk space PANIC level
(95%)^J&red /te
stdata (97%) has reached the defined disk space PANIC level
(95%)^J^J/dev/hd3
786432 56068 730364 8% /tmp^J/dev/hd4 589824
804
60 509364 14% /^J/dev/hd1 65536 11320 54216
18% /home^
J/dev/lv02 196608 63432 133176 33% /pc^J/dev/hd9var
524
288 221280 303008 43% /var^J/dev/hd2 2097152 1183316
91383
6 57% /usr^J/dev/hd10opt 65536 51720 13816 79%
/opt^J/dev/lv0
1 49610752 39753476 9857276 81% /data^J/dev/fslv00
27066368 26
058608 1007760 97% /testdata^J/dev/lv00 3604480 3588508
15972
100% /pro: not found.
Tue May 23 14:13:50 2006 bb-local.sh
/home/crisd/bbnew/bbc1.9i-btf/bin/bb-combo.
sh[59]: combo^Jstatus .cpu green Tue May 23 14:13:49 EET 2006 up: 130
days, 2 us
ers, 79 procs, load=18^J^J^JLOAD AVG on is 18: not found.
Tue May 23 14:13:50 2006 bb-local.sh
/home/crisd/bbnew/bbc1.9i-btf/bin/bb-combo.
sh[67]: status .msgs red Tue May 23 14:13:49 EET 2006 Urgent message
file proble
ms reported^J^J^J&red /var/adm/syslog/syslog.log has vanished^J: not
found.
Tue May 23 14:13:50 2006 bb-local.sh
/home/crisd/bbnew/bbc1.9i-btf/bin/bb-combo.
sh[153]: combo^Jstatus .procs green Tue May 23 14:13:50 EET 2006 All
processes a
re OK^J^J&green cron >=1 - 1 instance running ^J&green bbrun >=1 - 1
instance ru
nning : not found.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bb@bb4.com [mailto:owner-bb@bb4.com] On Behalf Of Philip
Clark
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 12:25 PM
To: bb@bb4.com
Subject: RE: {bb} dig on clients?
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 01:24, Cristian Danci wrote:
> Its returns 19
That looks OK.
> Background
>
> Several AIX boxes
>
> Versions 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3
>
> Version 5.1 = runbb.sh doesn't run out of the box and needed syntax
> changes
> Version 5.2 = Worked fine :)
> Version 5.3 = runbb.sh starts but nothing happens BBOUT file is empty
> (aside from starting BB entry)
So the one that we are concerned with here is 5.3
It would appear, from the previous output in BBOUT, that bb-combo.sh
may be the cause of part of the problem. If you remove the "set -x"
from bb-local.sh and add it to bb-combo.sh instead, you should get
a different trace output in BBOUT. Hopefully, that will provide
some more clues.
Also, with reference to your earlier post, if this machine has not
been configured with a hostname, you will have to provide a match
for the name used in the bb-hosts file in $BBHOME/etc/bbaliasname.
Otherwise, BB will not be able to determine how to correctly form
the messages it is trying to send.
Note that the "uname -n" command is not (directly) related to the
"named" daemon. I don't remember exactly how AIX used to do this
(and I don't think that I've ever seen 5.3), but "uname" is normally
just an interface to various local information. The "uname -n" often
uses a file, such as /etc/hostname, as a source. The DNS name (as
reported by "named" or another BIND) can be something else entirely.
Cheers, Phil.
--
By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves
began to suspect 'Hungry.' (Gary Larson, "The Far Side")
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.
According to our recent survey, more than half of Australian women (56%) think they're better off financially if they are not married
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, or to subscribe to the bb-digest list
send e-mail to mailto:majordomo@bb4.com with unsubscribe bb -and/or-
subscribe bb-digest in the BODY of the message.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index